Single-Stock SpaceX ETFs Are Coming, but They’re No-Gos for Most Investors

Single-stock ETFs come with a range of risks. “Just buy the stock.”

The SpaceX logo with a starship spacecraft in the background.
Jon Shapley/Houston Chronicle via Getty

Key Takeaways

  • Single-stock ETFs are slated to launch and follow SpaceX once it goes public.
  • These ETFs are risky short-term bets and not suitable for the average investor, analysts say.
  • As speculative investment vehicles, they rely on complex derivatives to boost returns, elevating risk levels.

Amid the hype of SpaceX’s IPO, Canadian investors will soon have a new way to get a piece of one of the world’s most talked-about companies: single-stock exchange-traded funds. But analysts say that most investors should avoid them.

Canadian ETF provider Harvest ETFs announced it will launch the Harvest SpaceX Enhanced High Income Shares ETF on June 15 under the ticker SPXE. A day later, independent investment manager Ninepoint Partners will launch its own Ninepoint SpaceX HighShares ETF under the ticker SXHI.

Single-stock ETFs aren’t new to Canada. Debuting in December 2022, there are now 113 such strategies, including ETFs providing targeted exposure to stocks like Meta Platforms META, Amazon AMZN, Tesla TSLA, and Apple AAPL. In August 2025, a new crop of single-stock ETFs hit the market that were built around leading domestic companies, including Shopify SHOP, Celestica CLS, and TD Bank TD.

However, analysts caution that these funds carry unique risks. “Single-stock ETFs are expensive, highly volatile, and amp up the risk of the underlying stock,” says Morningstar analyst Zachary Evens.

Single-Stock ETFs: Buyers Beware

Unlike traditional ETFs, which typically hold dozens or hundreds of securities, these funds are tied to the performance of a single stock. In addition, depending on their structure, these products use derivatives or employ options strategies such as covered calls to boost returns.

On some, the objective is to generate monthly income alongside capital gains. Others are designed to multiply the returns on the stock, generally by two or three times. Some such ETFs aim to leverage gains, and others will profit when the stock falls. Investors can read more about how these strategies work here.

One critical issue is that the complex math used in these ETFs could mean an erosion of returns when held for more than a short period. “If an investor holds the ETF for longer than a day or two, they are likely to suffer volatility decay,” says Evens. Volatility decay (also known as compounding drag) is the gradual loss of value of a leveraged ETF due to the mathematical effects of daily compounding, especially in a volatile market.

“Because these funds rebalance every day, the math of compounding means a volatile stock can chop sideways, and the leveraged product still loses money,” says Ben Jang, portfolio manager at Nicola Wealth. “These are trading instruments with a holding period measured in days, not core portfolio building blocks.”

There are other drawbacks to consider, such as high fees (since the costs of deploying complex strategies are often passed on to investors) and a lack of diversification. “Fees are typically many multiples of a broad index fund, and you’re concentrating in a single name at a moment of maximum enthusiasm,” Jang adds.

If the objective is to gain exposure to a company’s long-term growth prospects, Evens’ advice to investors is: “Just buy the stock.”

Who Should Consider Single-Stock ETFs?

Single-stock ETFs are generally considered niche products rather than core portfolio holdings.

“Single-stock ETFs are not for the faint of heart and should be used as trading tools only, if at all,” says Evens.

Jang thinks these products may be better-suited to sophisticated traders who want to make a quick bet on where the underlying stock will go over a day or two. “Mainly, these are tools for a narrow set of investors who understand daily-reset mechanics and are sizing positions accordingly,” he says. “For the average investor, the suitability bar is high, and layering 2 times leverage on top of a newly public stock with no trading history, at what’s likely the largest IPO valuation ever, is stacking risk on risk.”

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar's editorial policies.